2021

Tradeoff Theory and Leverage Dynamics of High-Frequency Debt Issuers
B Espen Eckbo, Michael Kisser
Review of Finance, Volume 25, Issue 2, March 2021, Pages 275–324, https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfaa018

Do public industrial firms manage leverage towards a long-run target? We test three core predictions of dynamic tradeoff theory using a hitherto unexplored set of US public industrial companies: high-frequency net-debt issuers (HFIs).… Read more...

Tradeoff Theory and Leverage Dynamics of High-Frequency Debt Issuers Read More »

Gender Dynamics in Crowdfunding (Kickstarter): Evidence on Entrepreneurs, Backers, and Taste-Based Discrimination
Hadar Gafni, Dan Marom, Alicia Robb, Orly Sade
Review of Finance, Volume 25, Issue 2, March 2021, Pages 235–274, https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfaa041

This study focuses on the launch phase of the leading reward-based crowdfunding market – Kickstarter.… Read more...

Gender Dynamics in Crowdfunding (Kickstarter): Evidence on Entrepreneurs, Backers, and Taste-Based Discrimination Read More »

We have made some changes to our Privacy Policy. These changes further clarify your rights with regards to the personal data we hold, and explain more fully our lawful basis for processing personal data. This update does not signify any change in the way we store or process personal data.… Read more...

Privacy Policy Update Read More »

Making Room for the Needy: The Credit-Reallocation Effects of the ECB’s Corporate QE
Óscar Arce, Sergio Mayordomo, Ricardo Gimeno
Review of Finance, Volume 25, Issue 1, February 2021, Pages 43–84, https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfaa020

We analyse how the ECB’s purchases of corporate bonds under its Corporate Sector Purchase Programme (CSPP) affected the financing of Spanish firms.… Read more...

Making Room for the Needy: The Credit-Reallocation Effects of the ECB’s Corporate QE Read More »

Harvey and Hirshleifer (2020) highlight how current norms are for journals to often follow the “Union Heuristic” – require authors to follow all referee suggestions and all referees to sign off for a paper to be published. They argue that this heuristic may lead to (a) innovative research not being published; (b) excessive paper length; (c) wasted author effort on analyses that add little value; and (d) burdens on referees, as papers are rejected at late rounds and then have to start the process again with new referees.… Read more...

Accelerated Review Process Read More »

Scroll to Top